MetroFlowNet: Adaptive Multi-Feature Fusion for Metro Passenger Movement Prediction | IJCSE Volume 10 – Issue 5 | IJCSE-V10I5P36

IJCSE
International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques
ISSN 2455-135X Ā· Peer-Reviewed Ā· Open Access
šŸ“š Volume 10, Issue 5
šŸ“… October 13, 2026
šŸ“„ Pages 276–280
šŸ”– ID: IJCSE-V10I5P36

MetroFlowNet: Adaptive Multi-Feature Fusion for Metro Passenger Movement Prediction

Author(s)

Rayapureddy Nithin, Uppala Teja, Neeli Charan Kumar, Uppala Harshith, Prof Kusum Sharma

Abstract

Metro systems generate passenger demand that changes across time, stations, travel directions, and operat ing conditions. Reliable passenger-flow prediction can support crowd management, service planning, and data-driven opera tional decisions. This paper presents MetroFlowNet, a project specific framework for predicting passenger movement from historical smart-card tap-in/tap-out observations. The frame work represents passenger demand through station-level and origin–destination (OD) information and combines temporal, spatial, and contextual variables before sequence prediction. The design emphasizes adaptive feature fusion so that the contribution of different feature groups can vary with the observed operating state. The proposed workflow contains data cleaning, time window aggregation, OD construction, temporal feature genera tion, spatial representation, feature normalization, model train ing, and multi-horizon evaluation. Recent research shows that passenger-flow forecasting benefits from models that represent both temporal dynamics and relationships among stations, while decomposition and multi-time representations can improve the treatment of recurrent demand patterns [1]–[5]. MetroFlowNet is designed as an independently implemented framework rather than a reproduction of any single published architecture. The final experimental study will compare MetroFlowNet with se lected baselines using MAE and RMSE and will include ablation experiments to quantify the contribution of each feature group. Project-specific dataset statistics and measured test results are intentionally reserved for insertion after the final experimental run.

Keywords

Origin–Destination Prediction, Metro Transit Networks, Adaptive Feature Fusion, Deep Learning, Spatio Temporal Forecasting, Smart Card Data.

Conclusion

MetroFlowNet offers a complete system for predicting passenger travel between origins and destinations. Using its Adaptive Feature Fusion Network the system combines data from sources to deliver better forecasting results, than existing methods. It works well in situations and improves overall accuracy.

References

[1] L. Liu, J. Chen, H. Wu, J. Zheng, Q. Peng, and X. Luo, ā€œPhysical
virtual collaboration modeling for intra- and inter-station passenger flow
prediction in metro systems,ā€ IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23,
no. 4, pp. 3601–3614, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3040523.
[2] Y. Zheng, L. Capra, O. Wolfson, and H. Yang, ā€œUrban computing:
Concepts, methodologies, and applications,ā€ ACM Trans. Intell. Syst.
Technol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 38:1–38:55, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1145/2629592.
[3] Y. Gong, Z. Li, J. Zhang, W. Liu, and B. Pan, ā€œOnline passenger flow
prediction for metro systems based on multi-source spatial-temporal
data,ā€ IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 3631–3642,
Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.2982845.
[4] H. Yao, F. Wu, J. Ke, X. Tang, Y. Jia, S. Lu, P. Goyal, and J. Ye,
ā€œDeep multi-view spatial-temporal network for taxi demand prediction,ā€
in Proc. 32nd AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. (AAAI), 2018, pp. 2588–2595.
ā€œData-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey,ā€ IEEE Trans.
Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1624–1639, Dec. 2011, doi:
10.1109/TITS.2011.2158001.
[6] Y. Wei and M. C. Chen, ā€œForecasting the short-term metro passenger
flow with empirical mode decomposition and neural networks,ā€ Transp.
Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 148–162, Apr. 2012,
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.06.009.
[7] F. ToquĀ“e, S. Come, M. El Mahrsi, and L. Oukhellou, ā€œShort term
passenger flow forecasting in public transportation with smart card data:
A comparison of predictable and unpredictable events,ā€ in Proc. IEEE
Intell. Transp. Syst. Conf. (ITSC), 2016, pp. 1111–1116.
[8] B. M. Williams and L. A. Hoel, ā€œModeling and forecasting vehicular
traffic flow as a seasonal ARIMA process: Theoretical basis and empir
ical results,ā€ J. Transp. Eng., vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 664–672, Nov. 2003,
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:6(664).
[9] S. B. Billings and J. S. Yang, ā€œApplication of the ARIMA models to
urban roadway travel time prediction—A case study,ā€ in Proc. IEEE Int.
Conf. Syst., Man Cybern. (SMC), 2006, pp. 2529–2534.
[10] Y. Li, R. Yu, C. Shahabi, and Y. Liu, ā€œDiffusion convolutional recurrent
neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting,ā€ in Proc. 6th Int. Conf.
Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2018.
[11] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, ā€œLong short-term memory,ā€ Neu
ral Comput., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, Nov. 1997, doi:
10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
[12] K. Cho, B. van MerriĀØenboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares,
H. Schwenk, and Y. Bengio, ā€œLearning phrase representations using
RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation,ā€ in Proc. Conf.
Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process. (EMNLP), 2014, pp. 1724–1734.
[13] R. Fu, Z. Zhang, and L. Li, ā€œUsing LSTM and GRU neural network
methods for traffic flow prediction,ā€ in Proc. 31st Youth Acad. Annu.
Conf. Chin. Assoc. Autom. (YAC), 2016, pp. 324–328.
[14] J. Zhang, Y. Zheng, and D. Qi, ā€œDeep spatio-temporal networks for
urban flow prediction,ā€ IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 30, no. 4,
pp. 663–676, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2017.2785760.
[15] B. Yu, H. Yin, and Z. Zhu, ā€œSpatio-temporal graph convolutional
networks: A deep learning framework for traffic forecasting,ā€ in Proc.
27th Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), 2018, pp. 3634–3640.
[16] L. Zhao, Y. Song, C. Zhang, Y. Liu, P. Wang, T. Lin, M. Deng, and H. Li,
ā€œT-GCN: A temporal graph convolutional network for traffic prediction,ā€
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 3848–3858, Sep.
2020, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2935152.
[17] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez,
L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, ā€œAttention is all you need,ā€ in Adv. Neural
Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 5998–6008.
[18] C. Zheng, X. Fan, C. Wang, and J. Qi, ā€œGMAN: A graph multi-attention
network for traffic prediction,ā€ in Proc. 34th AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell.
(AAAI), 2020, pp. 1234–1241.
[19] B. Liao, J. Zhang, C. Wu, D. McIlwraith, T. Chen, S. Yang, Y. Guo, and
F. Wu, ā€œDeep sequence learning with auxiliary information for traffic
prediction,ā€ in Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data
Min. (KDD), 2018, pp. 537–546.
[20] J. L. Ba, J. R. Kiros, and G. E. Hinton, ā€œLayer normalization,ā€ arXiv
preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016.
[21] I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, ā€œDecoupled weight decay regularization,ā€
in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2019

šŸ“‹ How to Cite This Paper

Rayapureddy Nithin, Uppala Teja, Neeli Charan Kumar, Uppala Harshith, Prof Kusum Sharma (2026). MetroFlowNet: Adaptive Multi-Feature Fusion for Metro Passenger Movement Prediction. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques, 10(5), 276–280. ISSN: 2455-135X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23345948
Ā© 2026 International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques (IJCSE). All rights reserved. Ā· ijcsejournal.org

Related Post

Submit Your Paper