AI-Driven Quantum-Safe IoT Security Framework for Real-Time Threat Detection | IJCSE Volume 10 β Issue 5 | IJCSE-V10I5P48
IJCSE
International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques
ISSN 2455-135X Β· Peer-Reviewed Β· Open Access
π Volume 10, Issue 5
π
October 23, 2026
π Pages 413β417
π ID: IJCSE-V10I5P48
Table of Contents
ToggleAI-Driven Quantum-Safe IoT Security Framework for Real-Time Threat Detection
Author(s)
Mrs. M. Gomathi, S. Sowndharya
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) devices now run in factories, hospitals, buildings and other critical infrastructure, so the security of their communication matters more every year. Most deployments protect keys and identities with RSA or elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC), which a large fault-tolerant quantum computer could break. At the same time, IoT networks are exposed to everyday attacks such as denial of service, port scanning and spoofing. In practice, cryptographic protection and intrusion detection are built as two unrelated pieces. This paper proposes a framework that studies them together. It pairs the NIST post-quantum standards ML-KEM (key establishment) and ML-DSA (digital signatures) with a Random Forest classifier and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for traffic analysis. An ESP32-class edge device, MQTT messaging, a signed event log and a monitoring dashboard complete the design. We describe the problem, the research gap, the architecture and the evaluation plan. The prototype is still to be built, so no measured results are reported.
Keywords
Internet of Things, post-quantum cryptography, ML-KEM, ML-DSA, ESP32, MQTT, intrusion detection, Random Forest, LSTM.
Conclusion
This paper proposed a coordinated IoT security design that addresses both the future risk to public-key cryptography and the network threats of today. It combines the NIST standards ML-KEM and ML-DSA, MQTT communication and Random Forest and LSTM intrusion detection. The literature review showed that integration, resource profiling, reproducible evaluation and clear protocol boundaries remain open issues. The modular architecture allows staged development and independent testing of each component. All performance values in this paper are planned targets for evaluation, not experimental findings.
References
National Institute of Standards and Technology, βModule-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard,β FIPS 203, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203.
[2] National Institute of Standards and Technology, βModule-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard,β FIPS 204, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204.
[3] National Institute of Standards and Technology, βStateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard,β FIPS 205, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205.
[4] P. W. Shor, βAlgorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring,β in Proc. 35th Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. (FOCS), 1994, pp. 124β134, doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700.
[5] E. Barker, βRecommendation for key management: Part 1 β General,β NIST Spec. Publ. 800-57 Part 1 Rev. 5, May 2020, doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5.
[6] M. J. Kannwischer, J. Rijneveld, P. Schwabe, and K. Stoffelen, βPQM4: Testing and benchmarking NIST PQC on ARM Cortex-M4,β in Proc. 8th ACM ASIA Public-Key Cryptography Workshop, 2021.
[7] I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, βToward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization,β in Proc. ICISSP, 2018, pp. 108β116, doi: 10.5220/0006639801080116.
[8] N. Moustafa and J. Slay, βUNSW-NB15: A comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems,β in Proc. Mil. Commun. Inf. Syst. Conf. (MilCIS), 2015, pp. 1β6, doi: 10.1109/MilCIS.2015.7348942.
[9] OASIS, βMQTT Version 5.0,β OASIS Standard, Mar. 2019.
[10] National Institute of Standards and Technology, βPost-Quantum Cryptography,β NIST Computer Security Resource Center. [Online]. Available: https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography
[11] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, βLong short-term memory,β Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. 8, pp. 1735β1780, 1997, doi:
[12] L. Breiman, βRandom forests,β Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5β32, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
[13] NIST, βGuidelines for the selection, configuration, and use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) implementations,β NIST Spec. Publ. 800-52 Rev. 2, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-52r2
[2] National Institute of Standards and Technology, βModule-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard,β FIPS 204, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204.
[3] National Institute of Standards and Technology, βStateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard,β FIPS 205, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205.
[4] P. W. Shor, βAlgorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring,β in Proc. 35th Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. (FOCS), 1994, pp. 124β134, doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700.
[5] E. Barker, βRecommendation for key management: Part 1 β General,β NIST Spec. Publ. 800-57 Part 1 Rev. 5, May 2020, doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5.
[6] M. J. Kannwischer, J. Rijneveld, P. Schwabe, and K. Stoffelen, βPQM4: Testing and benchmarking NIST PQC on ARM Cortex-M4,β in Proc. 8th ACM ASIA Public-Key Cryptography Workshop, 2021.
[7] I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, βToward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization,β in Proc. ICISSP, 2018, pp. 108β116, doi: 10.5220/0006639801080116.
[8] N. Moustafa and J. Slay, βUNSW-NB15: A comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems,β in Proc. Mil. Commun. Inf. Syst. Conf. (MilCIS), 2015, pp. 1β6, doi: 10.1109/MilCIS.2015.7348942.
[9] OASIS, βMQTT Version 5.0,β OASIS Standard, Mar. 2019.
[10] National Institute of Standards and Technology, βPost-Quantum Cryptography,β NIST Computer Security Resource Center. [Online]. Available: https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography
[11] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, βLong short-term memory,β Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. 8, pp. 1735β1780, 1997, doi:
[12] L. Breiman, βRandom forests,β Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5β32, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
[13] NIST, βGuidelines for the selection, configuration, and use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) implementations,β NIST Spec. Publ. 800-52 Rev. 2, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-52r2
π How to Cite This Paper
Mrs. M. Gomathi, S. Sowndharya (2026). AI-Driven Quantum-Safe IoT Security Framework for Real-Time Threat Detection. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques, 10(5), 413β417. ISSN: 2455-135X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23594801



