AI-Powered Risk Scoring and Optimization Techniques for Organizational Network Security | IJCSE Volume 10 â Issue 2 | IJCSE-V10I2P5
Table of Contents
ToggleInternational Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques
ISSN: 2455-135X
Volume 10, Issue 2
|
Published:
Author
Deepak Tomar, Saurabh Shrivastava, Kismat Chhillar, Alok Verma
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the approach of organizations on network security by allowing for real-time responses to threats, proactive and data-driven risk assessment. Machine learning models, AI-driven risk scoring methods and sophisticated analytics are utilized to identify vulnerabilities, prioritize potential threats, and optimization of resources allocation. These systems aid to enable ongoing monitoring and flexible evaluation of risk which in turn offers valuable insights helpful for decision-making. It also boosts the effectiveness of security measures against cyber threats that are ever-changing. Optimization strategies that are AI-driven facilitates organizations in automation of compliance processes, shortens incident response times, and upholds regulatory standards with better precision. Organizations can address high-risk anomalies quickly while minimizing human error and day-to-day operational costs by incorporation of explainable AI, automated remediation tools and adaptive defenses into their network frameworks. Although there are challenges related to transparency of models, data quality, and scalability, AI-powered solutions play a significant role to leap forward in protecting businesses from contemporary cyber risks. AI-driven risk scoring plays a crucial role for organizations to assess, forecast, and prioritize network security threats using machine learning techniques and advanced analytics. These approaches enhance protections for complex enterprise systems by enabling swift threat detection and automation of response actions. Future research should focus on developing explainable AI and robust AI methods for improvement of understanding and resilience against the landscape of cyber risks that is evolving at a very fast pace.
Keywords
AI-powered risk scoring, network security optimization, threat assessment, machine learning, explainable AI, automated remediationConclusion
AI-driven risk scoring methods and optimization techniques have truly marked a transformation on the way organizations approach security of network. Teams are empowered to allocate resources dynamically, detect threats proactively and automate incident responses. There are significant advantages such as scalability, enhanced accuracy and operational efficiency that help organizations in staying a step ahead of cyber threats that are ever-evolving. Yet, embracement of AI in cybersecurity has its own set of hurdles. Issues of ethical questions, privacy concerns, adversarial vulnerabilities and the complexities of AI integration demands careful attention for unlocking the full potential of AI techniques and solutions. Achievement of success demands for a thoughtful balance of clear governance, strong technical safeguards, skilled human oversight and ongoing model enhancements. These challenges directly need to be tackled so that organizations can create adaptable and resilient security frameworks. Such frameworks can uphold stakeholder trust and safeguard vital assets in a rapidly changing world of digital era.
References
[1] R. Gupta and P. Srivastava, “Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cyber security applications,” in Cyber Security Solutions for Protecting and Building the Future Smart Grid, D. Asija, R. Viral, R. Das and G. Tuna, Eds., Elsevier, 2025, pp. 271-296.
[2] M. Danish and M. M. Siraj, “AI and Cybersecurity: Defending Data and Privacy in the Digital Age,” Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25-35, May 2025.
[3] K. Dhanushkodi and S. Thejas, “AI Enabled Threat Detection: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Advanced Security and Cyber Threat Mitigation,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 173127-173136, 2024.
[4] I. Zografopoulos, J. Ospina, X. Liu and C. Konstantinou, “Cyber-Physical Energy Systems Security: Threat Modeling, Risk Assessment, Resources, Metrics, and Case Studies,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 29775-29818, February 2021.
[5] J. Jacobs, S. romanosky, B. Edwards, I. Adjerid and M. Roytman, “Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS),” Digital Threats: Research and Practice, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-17, July 2021.
[6] F. H. Alshammari, “Design of capability maturity model integration with cybersecurity risk severity complex prediction using bayesian-based machine learning models,” Service Oriented Computing and Applications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 59-72, March 2023.
[7] T. Zhukabayeva, A. Pervez, Y. Mardenov, M. Othman, N. Karabayev and Z. Ahmad, “A Traffic Analysis and Node Categorization- Aware Machine Learning-Integrated Framework for Cybersecurity Intrusion Detection and Prevention of WSNs in Smart Grids,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 91715-91733, July 2024.
[8] F. R. Alzaabi and A. Mehmood, “A Review of Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities in Malicious Insider Threat Detection Using Machine Learning Methods,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30907-30927, February 2024.
[9] M. A. Hossain and M. S. Islam, “Enhanced detection of obfuscated malware in memory dumps: a machine learning approach for advanced cybersecurity.,” Cybersecurity, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 16, 2024.
[10] A. Yeboah-Ofori, S. Islam, S. W. Lee, Z. U. Shamszaman, K. Muhammad and M. Altaf, “Cyber Threat Predictive Analytics for Improving Cyber Supply Chain Security,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 94318-94337, June 2021.
[11] A. Tanikonda, B. K. Pandey, S. R. Peddinti and S. R. Katragadda, “Advanced AI-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions for Proactive Threat Detection and Response in Complex Ecosystems,” Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 196-217, January 2022.
[12] Z. Zhang, H. A. Hamadi, E. Damiani, C. Y. Yeun and F. Taher, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 93104-93139, September 2022.

