The quality of website design significantly affects user experience and accessibility. Evaluating website quality requires a holistic approach that encompasses both quantitative factors, such as performance and validation errors, and qualitative factors, such as usability and compliance with standards. This paper proposes an Integrated Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Module (QQAM) that systematically assesses website quality by leveraging multiple automated tools including PowerMapper, HTML Validator, GTMetrix, and SortSite. QQAM integrates sitemap analysis, HTML validation, performance metrics, and quality characteristic assessment to produce a comprehensive evaluation of website quality status. Experimental application of QQAM on a sample site demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying structural, validation, performance, and compliance issues, providing actionable insights for website improvement.

This paper proposed the Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Module (QQAM) for comprehensive web design quality evaluation. QQAM integrates website structure analysis, HTML validation, performance assessment, and qualitative characteristic evaluation using established automated tools. Experimental application confirmed its effectiveness in revealing critical quality issues across multiple dimensions, enabling more informed and systematic website improvement strategies.

[1] J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, 1993. [2] J. Nielsen and R. Molich, “Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces,” in Proc. ACM CHI, 1990, pp. 249–256. [3] L. Olsina, G. Rossi, and D. Garrido, “A quantitative methodology for evaluation and comparison of web sites,” Int. J. Software Eng. Knowl. Eng., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–36, 2002. [4] ISO/IEC 25010, Systems and Software Engineering—Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE), 2011. [5] GTMetrix, “Website Performance Testing Tool,” 2024. [6] S. Souders, High Performance Web Sites, O’Reilly Media, 2007. [7] W3C, “Markup Validation Service,” World Wide Web Consortium, 2024. [8] SortSite, “Website Quality and Accessibility Testing Tool,” 2024. [9] W3C, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, 2018. [10] R. Ivory and M. Hearst, “The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 470–516, 2001. [11] A. Abran, A. Khelifi, W. Suryn, and A. Seffah, “Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards,” Software Quality Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 325–338, 2003.